Zapier vs Make vs n8n vs Power Automate: Which Fits Your Business?
A concise Canadian small-business guide to choosing Zapier, Make, n8n or Power Automate, with one realistic workflow and the tradeoffs that matter.
Check Power Automate first if most of your work stays inside Microsoft 365. Check Zapier first for a mixed collection of cloud applications. Consider Make when visible branching matters, and n8n when a technical operator will own the workflow.
These are starting points, not final rankings. No platform is automatically cheapest until you map one real workflow, including its failure path and human approvals.
A useful automation includes a decision, a person responsible for approval and a visible failure path.
- A website enquiry is received.
- The automation checks the required information and asks: Is the enquiry complete?
- If no, the workflow pauses and sends the missing information to staff for review. If yes, it continues.
- The automation updates the CRM and prepares a reply.
- A person checks and approves the draft.
- The reply is sent and a follow-up task is created.
- If any automated step fails, the original enquiry is retained, the error is recorded and the owner is notified.
Which platform should you check first?
| Platform | Check it first when | How usage is counted | Main caution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zapier | Check first when you use a mixed collection of cloud applications and want a broad connector catalogue. | Successful tasks; some AI and programmatic actions use multiple tasks | Cost can rise when one event creates several billable actions. |
| Make | Check when visible branching and data transformation matter and someone can own a more detailed scenario. | Credits; most non-AI module actions use one, while some AI/advanced features vary | Iterators, searches, retries, polling and variable-credit AI can multiply consumption. |
| n8n | Check when a technical operator needs code, complex logic, or a deliberate cloud versus self-hosted choice. | Whole workflow executions on published cloud plans, regardless of step count | Community Edition still needs hosting, updates, monitoring, backups and a named operator. |
| Microsoft Power Automate | Check first when most of the workflow remains inside Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, Excel and other Microsoft services. | Licences plus daily Power Platform requests; failures, retries and pagination can count | The exact connectors, owner, users and execution model determine whether Premium or a Process licence is required. |
The right starting point depends more on your existing software and who will maintain the workflow than on a feature-count score.
These units are not directly comparable. Map the real workflow before estimating cost.
What the starting prices do not tell you
The four platforms do not bill the same unit. A website enquiry that checks data, searches for a contact, prepares a draft and creates a task can consume several Zapier tasks or Make credits, one or more n8n Cloud executions, and a context-dependent number of Power Platform requests. That does not make the results directly comparable.
Current published starting points also need context:
- Zapier: Professional is advertised from US$19.99 per month with annual billing. Confirm the task allowance in the live selector. View official pricing.
- Make: The live selector showed $9 with annual billing and $12 with monthly billing for 10,000 credits, but did not identify the dollar currency clearly. Confirm currency and commitment at checkout. View official pricing.
- n8n: Cloud Starter is advertised at €20 per month with annual billing for 2,500 workflow executions. View official pricing.
- Microsoft Power Automate: Premium is C$20.40 per user per month, paid annually. Not every standard Microsoft 365 workflow requires Premium. View official pricing.
Prices and product documentation were reviewed on August 22, 2026. Confirm the live plan, displayed currency, billing commitment, connectors and usage allowance before purchasing.
What we have and have not tested
Computer Assist reviewed current official pricing, usage, licensing and error-handling documentation. We also inspected Make's interactive monthly and annual pricing states.
We have not yet run the same controlled workflow across all four products. Ease of use, reliability, recovery behaviour and value have therefore not been ranked as hands-on results. The prepared test uses synthetic enquiries, duplicates, missing data, a downstream failure and a replay after partial completion.
Four things that matter more than the logo
- Failure visibility: Someone must be notified when a connection expires or a step fails.
- Duplicate safety: Retrying a run must not create a second contact, email or task.
- Human control: Important messages, charges, deletions and decisions should stop for approval.
- Named ownership: A documented person must maintain connections, review failures and update the workflow.
An inexpensive automation that stops quietly is not a saving.
Before you buy
- Choose one repeated task with a clear start and finish.
- Draw every step, decision, loop, search, retry and approval.
- Confirm that the required connectors exist on the plan you are considering.
- Test missing data, duplicates and a failed downstream service.
- Give one person ownership, monitoring instructions and a manual fallback.
When the enterprise shortlist changes
Organizations needing centralized governance, complex integration, or formal procurement should evaluate enterprise integration platforms such as Workato, Boomi, or MuleSoft separately. They are not fair substitutes for a small self-service workflow tool.
Want help choosing or building it?
Computer Assist can map one real workflow, identify the correct billing units and licences, build a bounded pilot, test the failure path and document the handoff. Nothing important needs to be sent, charged or deleted without human approval.
If your work centres on Microsoft 365, see Microsoft 365 and Power Automate support. For a broader workflow, see AI automation services for Toronto small businesses.
Pricing and evidence notes
This is not an affiliate ranking, a reliability benchmark or a claim that every feature was tested. The shortlist is deliberately small because each product represents a materially different buying situation.
- Current first-party pricing is available to Canadian businesses.
- Each product represents a materially different buying model.
- Each can support multi-app workflows Computer Assist could realistically scope and configure.
- This is a decision set, not a ranking or a claim that these are the only capable products.
- Comparative ease, reliability and value labels remain provisional until the same controlled workflow test is complete.
A daily monitor checks selected official pages for availability or change. It never rewrites a price or recommendation. A person must review the actual source and update this guide.
Primary sources checked 2026-08-22View sources and update history
- Zapier: Plans and pricing: official source. Used for Plans, tiers, billing and contact-sales status.
- Zapier: Task usage rates: official source. Used for Task consumption.
- Zapier: Replay: official source. Used for Manual and automatic replay behaviour.
- Make: Plans and pricing: official source. Used for Prices, credits, expiry and cancellation.
- Make: Credits: official source. Used for Fixed/variable credit use and AI costs.
- Make: Error handling: official source. Used for Error handlers, incomplete executions and recovery options.
- n8n: Plans and pricing: official source. Used for Prices, executions, overage, cancellation and hosting.
- n8n: Executions: official source. Used for Workflow execution history and behaviour.
- n8n: Error handling: official source. Used for Error workflows and failure handling.
- Microsoft: Power Automate pricing (Canada): official source. Used for CAD prices, cadence, tax and features.
- Microsoft: Licence types: official source. Used for Scope, connectors and capacity.
- Microsoft: Request limits: official source. Used for Daily limits and counted requests.
- Microsoft: Test cloud flows: official source. Used for Testing, mock results, replay and duplicate side-effect cautions.
- Microsoft: Monitor cloud flows: official source. Used for Run history, monitoring and alerting.
Update history
- 2026-08-22: Initial comparison published from official pricing and usage sources.
- 2026-08-22: Removed abstract cost scenarios because tasks, credits, executions and Power Platform requests are not equivalent units. Added a concise workflow-led decision guide and a visible hands-on testing limitation.